Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions

In that perception, case legislation differs from 1 jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in Big apple would not be decided using case legislation from California. Alternatively, New York courts will evaluate the issue counting on binding precedent . If no previous decisions on the issue exist, Ny courts might look at precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority rather than binding authority. Other factors such as how aged the decision is as well as closeness towards the facts will affect the authority of the specific case in common regulation.

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to your determination of the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but will not be technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]

This is because transfer orders are typically viewed as within the administrative discretion of the employer. However, there could be exceptions in cases where the transfer is enthusiastic by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more

Because the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been attained, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

From the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court may be the highest court in the United States. Decreased courts on the federal level incorporate the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and also the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related to the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that entail parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each state has its individual judicial system that consists of trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Just about every state is often referred to as being the “supreme” court, although there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the The big apple Court of Appeals or the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state legislation and regulations, although state courts might also generally listen to cases involving federal laws.

However it is made very clear that police is free to acquire action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities topic to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused to your petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also ensure respect in the family get rid of in accordance with regulation and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they will act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security with the house is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. 9. Thinking about the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has become realized. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of within the terms stated over. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf with the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, along with the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for your dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all acting in their Positions with DCFS.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to follow.

The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation over the police, they usually must bear in case law management mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its various pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are necessary to protect rather than abduct. Read more

The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

The figured out Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced with the findings during the Impugned order, after recording of evidence on the respective parties. Read more